| Life in prison for a murder
that perhaps never even happened |
|
Family and justice group want freedom
for former detective convicted in wife's death |
By GINA BARTON
of the Journal Sentinel
staff
Last Updated: Aug. 3, 2002
Green Bay - If you believe
the prosecution, here's what happened:
John Maloney was sick of dealing with his estranged wife, Sandy. He thought
she was neglecting their three sons. She was abusing alcohol and drugs.
And she was missing court hearings in their pending divorce.
On the morning of Feb. 10,
1998, John called Sandy to tell her he would bring the boys for a visit
later that day.
That was the only way she
would let him onthe property without making a scene.
But John didn't bring the
kids. Instead, he tried to impress on Sandy the importance of attending
a hearing the following morning. The custody battle had dragged on for
nine months. He wanted it done. He wanted his 20-year marriage ended, so
he could move forward with his new girlfriend, Tracy Hellenbrand - who
was going to break up with him unless Sandy was out of their lives.
In the prosecution version,
John snapped. The former Green Bay police detective and arson investigator
bashed his wife over the head, strangled her with his bare hands, set her
house on fire and left her to burn.
The jurors believed it. Murder,
after all, was the only theory they heard.
But evidence that never made
it into court suggests the detective's wife might not have been murdered
at all.
John Maloney's children are
growing up virtually orphans as he serves life in prison - perhaps not
only for a crime he didn't commit, but for a crime that didn't happen.
John Maloney, now 45, met
Sandra Cator when both were students at Preble High School in the 1970s.
When John proposed shortly after Sandy's graduation, she accepted with
enthusiasm.
John remembers their first
seven years of marriage as among the happiest times in his life. Sandy
was a sweet and doting wife, one who played hostess at dinner parties but
wasn't afraid to go skinny-dipping when they were alone.
Sandy worked as a secretary
while John completed a two-year program in criminal justice. He went into
police work, looking for excitement and for a job that would have made
his parents - who died when he was a little boy - proud.
In the early 1980s, the couple's
life began to deteriorate slowly, he says.
The birth of their first
son, Matt, was difficult; the baby spent two days in intensive care with
doctors cautioning that he might not survive.
Matt made it through the
crisis, but his mother constantly worried about his health.
The couple had two more children.
Sandy was a "Kool-Aid mom" who looked after all the kids on the block.
Then, on the morning of a
Police Department picnic in the early 1990s, she woke up with a stiff neck.
She went to a chiropractor
but, instead of relief, ended up with a disturbing numbness on the right
side of her body.
She feared she had multiple
sclerosis, and although one specialist after another told her it wasn't
so, Sandy didn't believe them. A neurologist prescribed Klonopin, a highly
addictive anti-anxiety medication.
Over the next several years,
the woman John fell in love with slowly disappeared into prescription drug
and alcohol abuse. Her family struggled to get Sandy help.
She was in and out of rehab
programs and mental hospitals. She
wrecked one minivan. Then
another.
Those closest to her worried
that she would kill herself.
John slowly detached from
his sisters - even the one who raised him after his parents' deaths - not
wanting them to know about Sandy's problems.
He shielded the kids as best
he could and warned them never to get in the van with their mother if she
was acting strangely. When Sandy started arguing, John agreed with her,
whether he shared her views or not. It was the easiest way to keep the
situation from escalating.
An unrecognizable body
Sandy's mother, Lola Cator,
discovered the body on the morning of Feb. 11, 1998. Cator had driven to
Green Bay from her home in Madison that Wednesday morning. Inside, the
house was unnaturally dark - darker than a house should be, even on a foggy
winter morning, even with the curtains drawn.
"Sandy!" Cator called. No
answer.
The living room sofa was
a burned-out mess, and partially smoked cigarettes were all around. There
was no one in the three bedrooms, no one in the basement. A single window
was open, just a crack. Lacking oxygen, the fire had burned itself out.
All that remained was the smell of smoke. Everywhere.
Cator walked back toward
the living room, confused. Then she saw Sandy's charred body, seemingly
melted into what remained of the sofa. She had not even recognized it before.
Across town, John walked
out of divorce court, confident he would get custody of his three boys.
The only hitch: Sandy had failed to show up again, so nothing could be
finalized. John headed for his sister Ginny's house, where she and his
girlfriend were waiting to hear the news from court.
John walked in the door and
the telephone rang. A detective friend was on the line and said he was
coming over.
John turned to his sister:
"Either I really (messed) up at work, or Sandy's dead."
Accident or murder?
The first two fire investigators
on the scene, Capt. Cecil Bailey of the Green Bay Fire Department and Sheriff
Thomas J. Hinz of the Brown County Arson Task Force, determined that the
fire was accidental and believed it started with careless cigarette smoking.
A search of the house yielded
other potential clues. A kitchen garbage can contained five crumpled suicide
notes. An extension cord was tied around a basement ceiling pipe, with
one end hanging down. Two VCRs were stacked on a coffee table beneath the
dangling cord - nowhere near the television set.
Throughout the basement,
investigators used Luminol, a chemical that detects the presence of blood
even if it's been cleaned up. The chemical showed blood on the coffee table,
on the floor, in the laundry room and in the bathroom. Bloody rags and
tissues were found in the trash nearby, and a bloody women's shirt was
in the laundry hamper.
The basement shower door
revealed even more blood - and in that blood was the fingerprint of Sandy's
best friend, Jody Pawlak.
When Sandy's body was examined,
there was evidence that she had taken a few breaths of smoke. However,
her lungs did not have a fatal level of carbon monoxide, which puzzled
investigators. At the time of the autopsy, her blood-alcohol level was
0.25. A more sophisticated blood-alcohol test showed that a few hours before
the time of death, which was between 6 and 8 p.m., Sandy's blood-alcohol
content was at least 0.36 - nearly four times the level considered evidence
of intoxication in adult drivers in Wisconsin.
Nevertheless, Milwaukee County
Deputy Chief Medical Examiner John Teggatz - subbing for the Brown County
examiner, who was out of town - listed Sandy's cause of death as "probable
manual strangulation." Teggatz had found some evidence of bruising around
her neck. When he returned, Brown County Medical Examiner Gregory Schmunk
agreed.
Because Sandy was the wife
of a Green Bay police officer, local officials were worried about a perceived
conflict of interest in their investigation. The Wisconsin Department of
Justice took over. Special Agent Gregory J. Eggum determined that the fire
was deliberate, a decision the two local investigators ultimately came
to accept.
Winnebago County District
Attorney Joseph Paulus was named special prosecutor on the case.
John was the prime suspect.
And his girlfriend was the
key.
A secret video
Twelve years younger than
John, Tracy Hellenbrand was an investigator for the Internal Revenue Service.
She carried a badge and a gun.
At first, she provided John
with an unshakable alibi, saying he was with her the whole night - except
when he went to pick up Matt from an indoor baseball practice. She told
authorities she would wear a wire to help prove John's innocence.
But months later, after numerous
sessions with investigators, she began to believe he might be guilty. She
said she may have taken a nap that night, that John could have left the
house while she was asleep.
It was the turning point
investigators had been waiting for. With Tracy's cooperation, the police
secretly videotaped the couple at an Ashwaubenon hotel and at Tracy's mother's
Madison condominium. They coached her on how to question John about Sandy's
death.
They got nothing but a lot
of heated arguing and emphatic denials from John.
And then, pay dirt.
Tracy had gone to Las Vegas,
where she used to live, to get away from publicity surrounding the case.
She had invited John to visit, and the Lady Luck Hotel and Casino had agreed
to let police set up recording equipment.
As the grainy, black and
white videotape of their hotel room begins, Tracy is wearing a long, light-colored
tank top and no shorts. John, shirtless and muscular, has on dark shorts.
The time is 4:49 a.m.
The John on the videotape
is out of control. As Tracy accuses him repeatedly of killing Sandy, he
laces his denials with obscenities; at one point, he rushes toward her,
muscles tensed.
As 18 hours of tapes roll
on, John and Tracy fight almost constantly. But a few details helpful to
the prosecution slip out. The most incriminating scene is this one:
Tracy
"Why didn't you push 911 and run?"
John
"Oh, why would I?"
Tracy
"You didn't want to?"
John
"What would be on the phone then, huh?"
Tracy
"Your fingerprints."
John
"Right. And where would the call have come from?"
Tracy
"Did you go there to do it?"
John
"No."
Tracy
"Why did you go there then? . . ."
John
"To get done with the divorce. To get it over with."
"This guy admitted on videotape
that he was in the house that night, and that means he did it," Paulus
says. "This whole case was the videotape. . . . If the videotape hadn't
gotten in, we may not have charged the case."
Suspicious of girlfriend
From the moment he met Tracy
in a hotel bar, Milwaukee defense attorney Gerald Boyle was suspicious.
Boyle wanted to talk to John alone. Tracy kept coming back to the table.
Did John want some water? Didn't they need her help?
Looking back, John's family
says Tracy acted paranoid even before Sandy died. When Tracy and John first
became an item, she was leery of being introduced to his friends and sometimes
gave phony names. Ostensibly to avoid Sandy, she moved to a house on a
dead-end street overlooking the bay and answered the door with her gun
if she wasn't expecting visitors.
On the morning of Feb. 11,
after John's family found out about Sandy's death, Tracy and John's sister
Judy were drinking coffee. As Judy recalls it, Tracy got up from the table
and started walking down the hall. Then she turned around and said, "Oh,
my God, what if they find my hair there?"
"Tracy, you've never been
there," Judy answered. "Why would your hair be there?"
As the investigation progressed,
Tracy hired an attorney, even before John did. Boyle found out she kept
changing her story about the evening Sandy died. First there was no nap,
then one, then two - the last one added to her story after investigators
told her the first nap didn't fit the time of the murder.
Tracy agreed to take a lie
detector test, but employed deceptive techniques such as pursing her lips,
looking away from the polygraph examiner, and changing the cadence of her
voice as she answered questions, according to a police report. Later, police
discovered she had read a pamphlet about how to fool the machine.
Before Tracy agreed to set
up videotaped encounters with John, she demanded - and was granted - immunity
from prosecution.
In Boyle's view, the Las
Vegas videotape made Tracy look just as bad as John. On the tape, she asks
John if he'd planted one of her earrings - raising the question of whether
she thought one might be found at the house.
Boyle fought to have the
videotape disallowed as evidence, saying it violated John's civil rights.
And because Tracy was a law enforcement officer, Boyle argued that she
shouldn't have continued having sex with John while assisting the prosecution
undercover.
Brown County Circuit Judge
Peter Naze ruled against the defense; the jury would watch the tape.
Boyle and his co-counsel,
his daughter Bridget, knew John's statements on the videotape would be
hard to explain. Their strategy: Convince the jury that Tracy did it.
Tracy wanted John convicted
to remove suspicion from herself. As he had with Sandy, he said what Tracy
wanted to hear, she rewarded him with sexual favors.
As the trial progressed,
Tracy didn't give straight answers to several questions - not even those
posed by the prosecution.
The first day of her testimony,
she wore a sweater and pearls, with perfect makeup. The next day, her clothes
were a wrinkled mess and there were dark circles under her eyes. The jury
never heard why: In the middle of the night, Tracy had tried to leave town,
and the police had put out an all-points bulletin for her. The Boyles chose
not to bring it up, fearing it could backfire if she painted herself as
a victim.
Tracy declined to be interviewed
for this article.
A different scenario
John did not testify in the
eight-day trial, which ended Feb. 17, 1999 - almost a year to the day after
Sandy's death.
The jury was out for 12 hours.
With every passing minute, Bridget Boyle became more convinced their client
would go free. When she heard the verdict, she wept.
The judge ordered Matt, Aaron
and Sean - all sobbing - ushered from the courtroom. Their father would
be sentenced to life in prison, with his first chance for parole in 2024.
Within months, Truth in Justice,
a Virginia-based group that tries to free prisoners it believes were wrongly
convicted, embraced John's case. Sheila Berry, a leader of the group, is
a former victim-witness coordinator for Winnebago County and a cousin of
Paulus' ex-wife. Paulus, the district attorney, fired Berry after the two
locked horns over a rape case in the early 1990s. At the time, Paulus was
a rising star who aspired to be U.S. attorney. Local media nicknamed him
"Hollywood Joe."
Today, Paulus is the subject
of an FBI investigation that centers on drunken-driving defendants who
have said they paid to get plea bargains and shorter sentences. Two Winnebago
County judgesalso have asked the state Office of Lawyer Regulation to look
into the accusations.
Paulus has denied wrongdoing
in the drunken-driving cases, and he dismisses questions about his prosecution
of John Maloney.
"This was a homicide," he
says. "She received a blow to the head, she was strangled and set on fire.
To say it's an accident, that's not only preposterous, that's laughable
to me."
But to Truth in Justice -
and to Maloney's family - what's preposterous is that the trial unfolded
with no mention of the scene in Sandy's basement.
Berry and others paint this
picture:
Sandy Maloney was distraught
that night. She had been drinking vodka. She wrote draft after draft of
a suicide note, all similar to this one: "Dear John, I hate you. But I
really loved you. I am sorry. I am sorry. Take care of the kids. Love,
Sandy."
Then the 40-year-old mother
went to the basement, tossed the electrical cord over the ceiling pipe
and tied a crude noose. She stacked the two VCRs on the coffee table, stepped
on top of them and prepared to hang herself. But the noose didn't
hold and Sandy crashed to the ground, smashing her head on the table.
As the theory goes, that's
how her best friend, Pawlak, found her. That's also how she got bruises
around the neck.
Pawlak, who had a key to
the house and periodically came over to check on Sandy, helped her to a
basement bathroom to clean up. They threw Sandy's bloody shirt in the hamper
and wiped up blood from the table and floor with rags and tissues. Pawlak
guided Sandy upstairs to the couch and covered her with a blanket. Then
she left her friend on the couch with her cigarettes.
Sandy's blood-alcohol level
was potentially lethal, according toJames D. Dibdin, a California forensic
pathologist hired by Truth in Justice. He theorized that Sandy was in an
irreversible, alcohol-induced coma for five to seven hours before she died.
As the fire came to life, her breathing was shallow. She died from a combination
of blood-alcohol poisoning and carbon monoxide poisoning.
To bolster its argument further,
Truth in Justice worked with eight arson investigators from across the
country, who review facts about the fire. They all considered it accidental.
Neither this theory nor any
of the evidence supporting it ever made it into court.
Prosecutors said the basement
scene was irrelevant. The test with Luminol couldn't determine when the
blood was cleaned up - it could have been months or years before Feb. 10.
Forensics couldn't prove whether Pawlak's fingerprint was left behind on
the day of Sandy's death or at some other time. When police interviewed
Pawlak, she said she wasn't at the home that day. They never asked her
about the blood in the basement or her fingerprint. She declined to be
interviewed for this article.
As for Boyle: "If I would
have tried to call this an accident, it would have been malpractice," he
says. "I didn't have anybody who said it was an accident, and I didn't
have any basis for it being an accident."
Boyle went to his own experts
to review the evidence. They could find no fault with the findings that
ruled out accidental death. Further, Pawlak, who was under no obligation
to meet with Boyle's investigators, refused to talk. He had no way of knowing
what she might say if called to the stand. It also bothered Boyle that
the ceiling pipe in the basement wasn't bent, as he believed it would have
been if Sandy had tried to hang herself.
The Boyles took the case
before the state Court of Appeals but lost in September 2000. The state
Supreme Court then declined to hear their argument. The defense attorneys
next planned to take the appeal to the federal court. They never got there;
they were fired in early 2001, and Milwaukee attorney Lew Wasserman took
over.
This spring, Maloney filed
grievances with the Office of Lawyer Regulation, alleging misconduct by
Gerald Boyle. The grievances are pending.
"This is the most bizarre
case I've ever seen in 23 years of practice," Wasserman says.
He plans to go back to court
to argue that John didn't get a fair trial because of the quality of his
defense.
Wasserman argues that the
Boyles brought in only one expert witness, former Green Bay police arson
investigator Randy Winkler, and he was a poor choice. Winkler testified
that the arsonist was an amateur.
Someone who twisted pieces
of Kleenex and stuck them in the couch to make it burn faster, but then
didn't light all of them. Someone who didn't know how much oxygen a fire
needs, and so didn't open enough windows. In short, as the Boyles concluded,
someone like Tracy - not John, the arson investigator.
But on cross-examination,
Winkler said he had been forced to retire from the Police Department because
of psychological problems and that he held a grudge. The prosecution implied
he would lie because of it.
Further, buried in police
reports is a statement from Winkler in which he said he thought John was
guilty.
What's more, Winkler compared
John to serial killers Charles Manson and Ted Bundy.
"Why would the defense use
this man as an expert?" Wasserman says. "It makes no sense."
Gerald Boyle maintains that
Winkler is a well-respected arson expert despite his problems.
"Everybody thought John Maloney
did it," he says. "I convinced him John Maloney was not guilty. I wanted
one thing out of Winkler: that the fire was not properly vented and a sophisticated
arsonist would have made sure it was."
Wasserman has another complaint:
About the time of the Maloney case, Boyle was dealing with the aftermath
of a highly publicized sexual harassment case involving a fired Miller
Brewing Co. worker - the so-called Seinfeld case.
A jury awarded Jerold Mackenzie
about $25 million, a verdict that was ultimately overturned.
Before the jury verdict,
Boyle and Mackenzie arranged a line of credit from venture capitalist and
sports agent Joe Sweeney.
When the big-money verdict
was overturned, Mackenzie went bankrupt and Boyle had to repay about $300,000.
According to Wasserman, such
financial concerns were a reason Boyle, who was paid $140,000 by the Maloneys,
didn't bring in any experts who supported the accident theory. (Winkler
helped the defense for free.)
Boyle believes John's best
chance at vindication was to take the argument against the videotape and
Tracy's role in it to federal court. But Boyle was fired before that appeal
could be made, and now the legal time limit has expired.
"A horrible, horrible injustice
has been done to John Maloney," said Boyle, who still professes his former
client's innocence.
Wishes he could go back
John is incarcerated at the
Dodge Correctional Institution in Waupun, where he makes 18 cents an hour
as a "swamper" - mopping floors, cleaning toilets, doing laundry and handing
out clean sheets to the other prisoners. He says he wishes he could go
back to the trial and explain that videotape to the jury. He would tell
them he and Tracy had talked almost non-stop about Sandy. That they were
tossing out theories of the crime, not facts.
That they were discussing
different days when he'd gone to his wife's house, not the day of her death.
Most of all, though, he wishes
he could tell the jurors that he knows what it's like to grow up without
a mother, and that no matter how troubled Sandy was, he never would have
taken her away from their sons.
His sister Ginny is raising
the boys now.
She's also working constantly
to free her brother, whether it's nagging lawyers, holding bake sales to
pay them, writing to politicians or helping Matt with the family's Web
site.
Ginny is the one who takes
the boys to the prison to visit their father - and to the mausoleum to
see their mother. On a shelf behind glass, Sandy's urn is a gold box with
a raised rose on the front.
"She knows what happened,"
Ginny says. "All I can say is, help us out, Sandy."
John Maloney is shown with
his wife, Sandy, and their children (from left) Aaron, Matt, Sean.
|
John Maloney, a Green Bay
Police veteran convicted of killing his wife, is serving a life sentence
at Dodge Correctional Institution in Waupun.
|
Ginny Maloney has been taking
care of nephews (left to right) Sean, 15, Aaron, 14, Matt, 17, while their
father serves a life sentense for the death of their mother. Their aunt
takes the boys to the prison to visit their father and to the mausoleum
to see their mother.
|
An electrical cord hangs
from a ceiling pipe in Sandy Maloneys basement. Near the dangling cord
are two VCR's stacked on a coffee table. One theory not explored at the
homicide trial of her husband was that Sandy Maloney May have attempted
suicide by standing atop the VCR's and trying to hang herself with the
cord.
|
Tracy Hellenbrand, then-girlfriend
of John Maloney, the former police detective convicted of murdering his
estranged wife, testifies in 1999 about statements she says Maloney made
to her.
|
© Copyright
MIP
1999
|