| The Case | News | Links | Contact |
News

Site Updates and News
"There has to be an end of this litigation," (Judge) Naze said in rejecting Brinckman's requests.

"Not in a homicide case where someone is spending the rest of their life in prison," (defense attorney) Brinckman countered. 

The Wisconsin Supreme Court lost no time dealing with Robins' Petition.  It was denied ex parte (which means "one-sided"), with no comment or explanation, on October 13, 2006.  And it appears to have been more ex parte than meets the eye.  It turns out that during September, 2006, for no apparent reason, Deputy Attorney General Daniel Bach generated a memorandum defending the conduct of both Eggum and the WDOJ in this case.  Is it synchronicity that the state supreme court's denial followed tight on the heels of Bach's memorandum?  Or did the justices get a copy of it over the transom?  The court says clerks looked in all Maloney's public appellate files and couldn't find the memorandum.  (Gosh, maybe they aren't looking in the right place.)  WDOJ has failed to respond to an Open Records request for the memorandum.  Apparently, in Wisconsin, those at the highest echelons of law enforcement are above the law.
  •  Take a trip through the hall of mirrors called the Wisconsin Department of Justice
    • Listen to Wis. Attorney General Peg Lautenschlager tell Matt Maloney to report forensic fraud and perjury by DCI arson investigator Greg Eggum to the Wisconsin Department of Justice
    • Read the corruption complaint filed against DCI arson investigator Greg Eggum (links to complaint and all documentation)
    • Listen to DCI arson investigator Greg Eggum's response
    • Read the letter from the Wisconsin Department of Justice saying -- twice -- "I will not be pursuing your complaint."
    • Ask yourself:  Why is it more important for the Wisconsin Department of Justice to cover up crimes by its own agents than to admit when their agent put an innocent man in prison?
Click HERE to read supplemental brief (pdf format). 
Click HERE to read affidavit (MS Word format)
Click HERE to read supplemental reply brief (pdf format)


A Question Of Murder
Original Broadcast 3/26/05


John Maloney
Does John Maloney deserve a new trial?

Not Sure:
1.17%
Yes:
93.45%
No:
5.38%
NOTE: This is not a scientific poll. The results above are for information purposes only, and should not be confused with the results of the scientific polls conducted by CBS News.

© Copyright MIP 1999-2008








Free Hit Counter
free hit counter