| Topic: 48 Hours Mystery: A Question
of Murder, Does John Maloney deserve a new trial? |
|
|
|
jackb7552
Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: Mar. 2005
|
 |
Posted: Mar. 26 2005,23:40 |
|
This man is proof positive
that the criminal justice system is in serious trouble! Let this man
have a new trial and be able to get on with what is left of his life.
Talk about someone SET UP!! Amazing! |
|
|
wizardelf
Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: Mar. 2005
|
|
Posted: Mar. 26 2005,23:40 |
|
NO!!! he did not murder
Sandy - he has been harassed and tortured by the courts - how many
times has this happened??
Too many ignorants trying to give evidence that they are not qualified
to do so. |
|
|
JM4255
Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: Mar. 2005
|
|
Posted: Mar. 26 2005,23:40 |
|
Of course he deserves a new
trial,even without the new forensic evidence,the conviction of the
Prosacutor is enough. |
|
|
sirdump
Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: Mar. 2005
|
|
Posted: Mar. 26 2005,23:38 |
|
He deserves a new trial. and
in "MY" personal opinion will go free. The prosecution was corrupted by
Paulus the criminal DA. and with all likelyhood the evidence and new
info brought about by outside investigations into the case (Genie
Anthony) esspecially, i wouldn't be suprised if the state is going to
end up in a wrongful imprisonment lawsuit. |
|
|
gemini624you
Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: Mar. 2005
|
|
Posted: Mar. 26 2005,23:37 |
|
John Maloney deserves a new
trial. It is apparent that the evidence submitted was incorrect and
also all evidence that should have been submitted to prove his
innosence was not entered during his trial. |
|
|
monika
Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: Mar. 2005
|
|
Posted: Mar. 26 2005,23:37 |
|
my mother was a carbon copy
of sandy maloney. this guy is not guilty! the kids would certainly
know, having lived that nightmare from an early age. they know what is
up! |
|
|
gemini624you
Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: Mar. 2005
|
|
Posted: Mar. 26 2005,23:35 |
|
John Maloney deserves a new
trial. It is apparent that the evidence submitted was incorrect and
also all evidence that should have been submitted to prove his
innosence was not entered during his trial. |
|
|
ric_sxm
Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: Mar. 2005
|
|
Posted: Mar. 26 2005,23:35 |
|
He should get a new trial.
Too many questions regarding the evidence, his wife and the
states attorney left unanswered. |
|
|
texasjustice
Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: Mar. 2005
|
|
Posted: Mar. 26 2005,23:35 |
|
From all that has been
presented on this program my husband and I do not understand how this
man could possibly be guilty. It appears that much was left out
of his trial that would have made the verdict much different...NOT
GUILTY! |
|
|
secretagent0070
Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: Mar. 2005
|
|
Posted: Mar. 26 2005,23:35 |
|
I think everyone who is
faced with so many things that don't add up as in this case deserves a
new trial. Our justice system works the same as corporate
America, leave out the important information so that the scale is
tipped to the hands of those who have personal gains or personal stakes
involved.
The Prosecuting Attorney in this case here did not turn over all
evidence to the Defense Attorney. Regardless whether or not the
evidence is used or not used in trial, to be a fair trial, ALL evidence
used or not should be turned over by the Prosecuting and Defense
Attorney's. The biggest problem in our justice system is both
sides are more interested in winning than deriving the truth. |
|
|
|
