| The Case | News | Links | Contact |

An Alternate Timeline



Joe Paulus and the DCI investigators worked hard building a timeline to support their theory that John Maloney had a window of opportunity in which he could have killed Sandy and set fire to her house.  But there is another timeline running in the background.  It is a simple and deeply disturbing timeline that no judge or jury has reviewed.   It supports a reasonable and legitimate inference that the special prosecutor, Tracy’s attorney and John’s attorney conspired to frame John Maloney for Sandy’s death, for payments of money by Paulus.
  • May 2, 1998:  Tracy retains Steve Kohn to represent her regarding Sandy’s death.
  • May 8, 1998:  At Tracy’s insistence and on her lawyer’s recommendation, John phones Gerald Boyle and retains Boyle to represent him regarding Sandy’s death.
  • May 16, 1998:  John, along with Tracy, meets in person with his lawyer and pays a retainer.  Tracy’s behavior is bizarre.  Boyle says Tracy is the one person John can trust.
  • June 2, 1998:  Paulus and Kohn have sketched out a “use immunity” agreement in exchange for Tracy’s “cooperation”; Paulus gives S/A Skorlinski a list of Tracy’s records to be turned over by the IRS.
  • October 1, 2001: Gerald Boyle admits under oath that during the time he represented John, he was "desperate for money."
  • September 11, 2002:  Paulus loses his bid for re-election as DA after tapes are released in which he bragged of having sex with women in his office during office hours.
  • December 29, 2002:  Paulus and Boyle announce the formation of their new, joint law practice, Boyle, Boyle & Paulus, after Paulus is unable to find other employment.  Without being asked about it, Boyle tells the press that any assertion he and Paulus were "in cahoots" in the Maloney case "is bordering on slander."
  • April 26, 2004:  Paulus pleads guilty in federal court to taking $48,050 in bribes to fix cases between 1998 and 2000 -- precisely the time period when he was prosecuting John Maloney. 
Despite the influx of so much cash, Paulus' life style did not change during that time.  What did he do with the money?  Did it go into one hand and out the other, to Boyle, to take a dive on Maloney's case?  Does that explain Boyle's otherwise inexplicably abysmal performance? 



© Copyright MIP 1999-2004